[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKi4VAJwD45VbWuCHegfkB-tbgvgza52-cgVNF4AxF8NCuYyRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:29:01 -0300
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Fabio Mello <fabio.mello@...el.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: use enable on resume instead initialization
Hi Mika,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:50:28PM -0300, lucas.de.marchi@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Fabio Mello <fabio.mello@...el.com>
>>
>> According to documentation and tests, initialization is not
>> necessary on module resume, since the controller keeps its state
>> between disable/enable. Change the target address is also allowed.
>>
>> So, this patch replaces the initialization on module resume with a
>> simple enable, and removes the (non required anymore) enables and
>> disables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Mello <fabio.mello@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> These pictures explain a little more the consequence of letting the
>> enable+disable in the code:
>>
>> http://pub.politreco.com/paste/TEK0011-before.jpg
>> http://pub.politreco.com/paste/TEK0007-after.jpg
>>
>> The yellow line is a GPIO toggle in userspace to mark when we start and finish
>> the i2c transactions. The blue line is the SCL in that i2c bus. Take a look on
>> the huge pauses we have between any 2 transactions. These pauses are removed
>> with this patch and we are able to read our sensor's values in 950usec rather
>> than 5.24msec we had before. We are testing this using a Minnowboard Max that
>> has a designware i2c controller.
>
> Did you test this on any other platform than Intel Baytrail?
No. The only soc we have here with this controller is the Baytrail.
--
Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists