linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/asm/entry/32: Replace RESTORE_RSI_RDI[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:03:59 +0200
From:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/asm/entry/32: Replace RESTORE_RSI_RDI[_RDX] with
 open-coded 32-bit reads

On 06/09/2015 09:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>> This doesn't change much, but this uses shorter 32-bit insns:
>>
>>         -48 8b 74 24 68         mov    0x68(%rsp),%rsi
>>         -48 8b 7c 24 70         mov    0x70(%rsp),%rdi
>>         -48 8b 54 24 60         mov    0x60(%rsp),%rdx
>>         +8b 74 24 68            mov    0x68(%rsp),%esi
>>         +8b 7c 24 70            mov    0x70(%rsp),%edi
>>         +8b 54 24 60            mov    0x60(%rsp),%edx
>>
>> Since these are the only uses of RESTORE_RSI_RDI[_RDX], drop these macros.
>>
> 
> It probably doesn't matter for these fast paths, but, for the full
> slow path return, we really do need to restore the full pt_regs.
> After all, the syscall we're returning from might be sigreturn.

This is compat 32-bit syscall handling code.
IIUC we do not restore high half of any registers for 32-bit tasks.

Am I missing something?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/