[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5577462A.40402@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:01:46 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: Send one IPI per CPU to TLB flush all entries
after unmapping pages
On 06/09/2015 01:31 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> An IPI is sent to flush remote TLBs when a page is unmapped that was
> potentially accesssed by other CPUs. There are many circumstances where
> this happens but the obvious one is kswapd reclaiming pages belonging to
> a running process as kswapd and the task are likely running on separate CPUs.
> It's still a noticeable improvement with vmstat showing interrupts went
> from roughly 500K per second to 45K per second.
>
> The patch will have no impact on workloads with no memory pressure or
> have relatively few mapped pages. It will have an unpredictable impact
> on the workload running on the CPU being flushed as it'll depend on how
> many TLB entries need to be refilled and how long that takes. Worst case,
> the TLB will be completely cleared of active entries when the target PFNs
> were not resident at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists