[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150609201134.GJ3136@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:11:34 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: perf/ftrace: does PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER serve any purpose?
Em Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:07:01PM -0400, Vince Weaver escreveu:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > What kernel are you using? You may need to update perf.
> >
> > We switched to a tracefs filesystem, but the old perf wont read any
> > events if it's not located in debugfs. That is, it actually tested
> > which filesystem the event files were mounted on, and if they didn't
> > match the debugfs mount type, it ignored them. That was fixed recently.
>
> I am running 4.1-rc7 and was trying to use perf_4.0.
>
> If I use the kernel's version of perf it works.
>
> sigh.
Indeed, its always a shame when that happens, I had a similar reaction
when Steven told it was validating the filesystem type, completely
unnecessary, has been there for a long time :-\
Date: Tue Jul 21 12:20:22 2009 -0400
perf_counter: Add tracepoint support to perf list, perf stat
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists