[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16ebb290641f700f2262527f90ff1e46@agner.ch>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 22:31:07 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
aaron@...tycactus.com, marb@...at.de, pawel.moll@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
galak@...eaurora.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bpringlemeir@...ps.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: Freescale NFC for VF610,
MPC5125 and others
On 2015-06-09 22:07, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2015-06-03 17:05:16 [+0200], Stefan Agner wrote:
>> As Boris guessed correctly, the reason I used the raw variant was due to
>> performance improvements due to the barrier. However, I will use
>
> yeah, do you have any numbers by chance?
Not current ones for Linux. I added this in the U-Boot variant of the
driver.
>> {read|write}l_relaxed instead, which should offer endian abstraction
>> while not having the performance penalty due to extensive barriers...
>
> well, even those
> |$ git grep readl_relaxed arch/powerpc/
> |arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:#define readl_relaxed(addr) readl(addr)
>
> have the endian swap. So an abstraction like you provided earlier
> would be nice :)
What do you mean by that?
Btw, I sent v5 of the patchset which use the relaxed variants. As
expected, performance did not suffer by that change on ARM.
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists