linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] scatterlist: cleanup sg_chain() and sg_unmark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150610053803.GA1693@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:38:04 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@....de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scatterlist: cleanup sg_chain() and sg_unmark_end()

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:27:15PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> +#define scatterwalk_sg_chain(prv, num, sgl)	sg_chain(prv, num, sgl)
> +#define scatterwalk_sg_next(sgl)		sg_next(sgl)

Why are you reintroducing the scatterwalk_sg_next macro that we
just removed?

I also don't understand why this is so urgent that it has to go
into mainline at this late date.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/