[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433919306.1495.55.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:55:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, ktkhai@...allels.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...il.com,
pang.xunlei@...aro.org, wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] hrtimer: Allow hrtimer::function() to free the
timer
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 23:33 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yes, but wmb() is cheap on x86... Perhaps we can make this code
> "obviously correct" ?
I'll reply to the rest a bit later; got to run some errands first.
The 'problem' of course is ARM/PPC etc.. we would like to keep this
generic code fast, even for the loosely ordered machines.
And wmb() is certainly not cheap for them; although not as bad as a full
barrier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists