[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55777E9E.1000808@plumgrid.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:02:38 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, acme@...nel.org,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
namhyung@...nel.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
paulus@...ba.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...hat.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
hekuang@...wei.com, xiakaixu@...wei.com, pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 32/32] perf record: Add LLVM options for compiling
BPF scripts
On 6/8/15 10:50 PM, Wang Nan wrote:
> Although previous patch allows setting BPF compiler related options in
> perfconfig, on some ad-hoc situation it still requires passing options
> through cmdline. This patch introduces 4 options to 'perf record' for
> this propose: --clang-path, --clang-opt, --llc-path and --llc-opt.
looks good. I hope only --clang will be used from time to time.
Today, indeed, --llc* are needed too.
btw, our experimental libbpfprog.so (which is clang and llvm libs
compiled into single .so with C api for compiling .c into bpf):
$ ls -lh libbpfprog.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 ast ast 31M Jun 9 16:49 libbpfprog.so
not tiny, but I think we should be able to include it into perf,
then perf will only have build dependencies on llvm instead of
run-time dependencies.
We'll release this lib as soon as it's a bit more stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists