[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610075813.GA2982@x1>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:58:13 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table
initialisation
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:42:49PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Take this out of the main .probe() routine in order to facilitate the
> > introduction of different ways to obtain 'duty cycle' information.
>
> This and the rest of the patches are fine but seem to depend on patch 4
> - can you please rebase and resend?
Done.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists