lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610110206.6194cc0f@ipc1.ka-ro>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:02:06 +0200
From:	Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, kernel@...inux.com, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [REBASED 2/5] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table
 initialisation

Hi,

> Take this out of the main .probe() routine in order to facilitate the
> introduction of different ways to obtain 'duty cycle' information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/mfd-child.c           | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/mfd-child.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-child.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-child.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f233add
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-child.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +
> +static int simple_mfd_child_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	printk("LEE: %s %s()[%d]: Enter\n", __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__);
> +
Debugging remnant?

> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Phys: %x: %x\n", res->start, resource_size(res));
> +
That's not an error message and thus shouldn't be printed with
dev_err(). dev_dbg() would be more appropriate here.

> +	base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> +	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Virt: %p\n", base);
dto.

> +
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ: %d\n", irq);
> +		return irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ: %d\n", irq);
> +
dto.
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id simple_mfd_child_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "simple-mfd-child" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, simple_mfd_child_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver simple_mfd_child_driver = {
> +	.probe = simple_mfd_child_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "simple-mfd-child",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(simple_mfd_child_of_match),
> +	},
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(simple_mfd_child_driver);
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> index ffa9612..25560fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
> @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>  
>  	return drvdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].uV;
>  }
> -
> -static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_ops = {
> +static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_table_ops = {
>  	.set_voltage_sel = pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel,
>  	.get_voltage_sel = pwm_regulator_get_voltage_sel,
>  	.list_voltage    = pwm_regulator_list_voltage,
> @@ -88,20 +87,55 @@ static struct regulator_ops pwm_regulator_voltage_ops = {
>  
>  static struct regulator_desc pwm_regulator_desc = {
>  	.name		= "pwm-regulator",
> -	.ops		= &pwm_regulator_voltage_ops,
>  	.type		= REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.supply_name    = "pwm",
>  };
>  
> +static int pwm_regulator_init_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				    struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct pwm_voltages *duty_cycle_table;
> +	int length;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", &length);
> +
> +	if ((length < sizeof(*duty_cycle_table)) ||
> +	    (length % sizeof(*duty_cycle_table))) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +			"voltage-table length(%d) is invalid\n",
> +			length);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	duty_cycle_table = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, length, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!duty_cycle_table)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "voltage-table",
> +					 (u32 *)duty_cycle_table,
> +					 length / sizeof(u32));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read voltage-table\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	drvdata->duty_cycle_table	= duty_cycle_table;
> +	pwm_regulator_desc.ops		= &pwm_regulator_voltage_table_ops;
> +	pwm_regulator_desc.n_voltages	= length / sizeof(*duty_cycle_table);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata;
> -	struct property *prop;
>  	struct regulator_dev *regulator;
>  	struct regulator_config config = { };
>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> -	int length, ret;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!np) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device Tree node missing\n");
> @@ -112,36 +146,15 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!drvdata)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	/* determine the number of voltage-table */
> -	prop = of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", &length);
> -	if (!prop) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No voltage-table\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if ((length < sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table)) ||
> -	    (length % sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table))) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "voltage-table length(%d) is invalid\n",
> -			length);
> +	if (of_find_property(np, "voltage-table", NULL)) {
> +		ret = pwm_regulator_init_table(pdev, drvdata);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No \"voltage-table\" supplied\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	pwm_regulator_desc.n_voltages = length / sizeof(*drvdata->duty_cycle_table);
> -
> -	drvdata->duty_cycle_table = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> -						 length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!drvdata->duty_cycle_table)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	/* read voltage table from DT property */
> -	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "voltage-table",
> -					 (u32 *)drvdata->duty_cycle_table,
> -					 length / sizeof(u32));
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "read voltage-table failed\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, np,
>  						      &pwm_regulator_desc);
>  	if (!config.init_data)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info@...o-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ