linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:58:51 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if
 hotpluggable

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:02:00PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:08:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 04/13/2015 06:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> > >> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> > >> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> [shmobile portion]
> > >> Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> > >> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
> > >> Cc: <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
> > >> Cc: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
> > >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> > > Let's see some more acks for this...
> > >
> > 
> > Nobody else has acked this so far. Shall I put it in the patch tracker
> > now? Or is there someone more specific we need an ack from?
> 
> I guess if people haven't responded by now, they're never going to respond,
> and I guess we take their non-response as tacit approval for the change.
> 
> Maybe we ought to have tacit-acked-by: which we can add when someones
> been Cc'd and hasn't responded. :)

I think we also need a "To:" tag for people who don't notice when they
are cc'ed ;).

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/