[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610150412.GR19417@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:04:12 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] x86/asm: Compile-time asm code validation
> > > - duplicate the destination code inside the function
> > > - convert the jump to a call
> >
> > That all won't work for a lot of cases.
>
> Hm, could you give an example?
Just a standard *_user exception handler.
>
> Well, I don't see how that's really a logical conclusion.
What's special about assembler code?
> But we're
> probably being too vague here... Do you have any examples where you
> really need to jump outside of a callable function?
It's not needed, but it's an optimization to optimize icache usage.
It is optional (-freorder-blocks-and-partition)
In this case gcc splits the function into two (hot and cold)
It's actually a nice optimization and it would be sad from stopping
the kernel from using it.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists