[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610151100.GA12757@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:11:00 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, boaz@...xistor.com,
david@...morbit.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
hpa@...or.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent
memory
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:35AM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Btw, I don't think this actually is safe without refcounting your kmap
> > structure.
> >
> > The driver model ->remove callback can be called at any time, which
> > will ioremap the memory and remap the kmap structure. But at this
> > point a user might still be using it.
>
> Won't the device data structures be pinned by the refcount on the bdev?
An open filesystem only keeps a reference on the request_queue. The
underlying driver model ->remove method will still be called on
a surprise removal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists