linux-kernel - [PATCHv3 0/2] creating non-section aligned lowmem mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1433962773-8402-1-git-send-email-orca.chen@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 02:59:31 +0800
From:	Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@...il.com>
To:	linux@....linux.org.uk
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCHv3 0/2] creating non-section aligned lowmem mappings

Hi,

I found problems when I reserved non-section aligned memory blocks
by the device tree. The problem is that the memblock_set_current_limit()
point to the first section aligned memblock in the
first place (sanity_check_meminfo), but the memblock may be split
into non-section aligned memblocks because the memblock_reserve() calls
in arm_memblock_init().


*** BLURB HERE ***

Min-Hua Chen (2):
  arm: fix non-section-aligned low memory mapping
  arm: use max_lowmem_limit in find_limit()

 arch/arm/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c  |   48 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/