[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610192236.GE333@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:22:36 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: clustered MD
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:05:33PM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> Separate bitmaps for each node sounds like a much better design than the
> cmirror design which used a single shared bitmap (I argued for using a
> single bitmap when cmirror was being designed.)
Sorry misspoke, I argued for one bitmap per node, like you're doing, so in
general I think you're starting off in a much better direction than I saw
before. (I still doubt there's enough value in this to do it at all,
which is another reason I'm particularly interested to see some real world
success with this.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists