[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9473dc801fb245ea8df91da31d426f7f@SC-EXCH04.marvell.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 05:00:03 +0000
From: Lisa Du <cldu@...vell.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: A race condition between debugfs and seq_file operation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: 2015年6月10日 5:12
> To: Lisa Du
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: A race condition between debugfs and seq_file operation
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:28:10AM +0000, Lisa Du wrote:
> > Hi, All
> > Recently I met one race condition related to debugfs.
> >
> > Take an example from ion.c in kernel3.14:
> > static int ion_debug_client_open(struct inode *inode, struct file
> > *file) {
> > return single_open(file, ion_debug_client_show, inode->i_private); }
> >
> > static const struct file_operations debug_client_fops = {
> > .open = ion_debug_client_open,
> > .read = seq_read,
> > .llseek = seq_lseek,
> > .release = single_release,
> > };
> > client->debug_root = debugfs_create_file(client->display_name, 0664,
> > dev->clients_debug_root,
> > client, &debug_client_fops);
> >
> > I find during I read the debugfs node, driver can do
> > debugfs_remove_recursive(dentry); Is it expected?
>
> Yes. Well, not "expected", but a mess, yes.
>
> Removing debugfs files are known to have lots of races, this isn't the only
> one :(
Thanks for the reply!
Not sure if there is any plan to resolve such races in the future?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists