[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610154658.2a9912ce@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:46:58 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <wanglong@...qinren.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <peifeiyue@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of
producer
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com> wrote:
> The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
> so correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
I also add this for stable 2.6.33+
Thanks, applied.
-- Steve
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> index 13d945c..1b28df2 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
>
> if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
> struct sched_param param = {
> - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
> + .sched_priority = producer_fifo
> };
> sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
> } else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists