[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610200138.GB32245@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:01:38 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] perf tools: Introduce xyarray__zero function
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:06:00PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:10:35PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > To zero all the xyarray contents. It will be used
> > in following patches.
>
> I guess I would prefer xyarray__memset(), similar semantics as
> 'memset()', but I did a quick look and this is used in the kernel in
> things like bitmap_zero() and wrappers to it have that semantic...
>
> Interesting that we don't have anymore a bzero() like function, but
> then, looking at 'man bzero':
>
> ----------------------------
> CONFORMING TO
>
> 4.3BSD. This function is deprecated (marked as LEGACY in
> POSIX.1-2001): use memset(3) in new programs. POSIX.1-2008 removes the
> specification of bzero().
>
> -----------------------------
>
> Guess we should use 'xyarray__memset()', ok?
hum, how about xyarray__reset ?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists