[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZVUaT4-C--Q7N8Teq1mQchYBYB95_Z1sJrjTXeh17MOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:18:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Tobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Return -EPROBE_DEFER if the gpiochip was not found
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> If a driver requests a GPIO described in its _CRS but the GPIO host
> controller (gpiochip) driver providing the GPIO has not been loaded yet
> acpi_get_gpiod() returns -ENODEV which causes the calling driver to fail.
>
> If the gpiochip driver is loaded afterwards the driver requesting the GPIO
> will not notice this.
>
> Better approach is to return -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. Then when the
> gpiochip driver appears the driver requesting the GPIO will be probed
> again. This also aligns ACPI GPIO lookup code closer to DT as it does
> pretty much the same when no gpiochip driver was found.
>
> Reported-by: Tobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Patch applied with the ACKs etc.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists