linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] mm/zpool: allow NULL `zpool' pointer in zpool_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:01:42 -0400
From:	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] mm/zpool: allow NULL `zpool' pointer in zpool_destroy_pool()

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
> On (06/10/15 17:48), Joe Perches wrote:
> [..]
>> > > > For consistency, tweak zpool_destroy_pool() and NULL-check the
>> > > > pointer there.
>> > > >
>> > > > Proposed by Andrew Morton.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>> > > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> > > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583
>> > >
>> > > Acked-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Shall we ask Joe to add zpool_destroy_pool() to the
>> > "$func(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required" list?
>>
>> []
>>
>> Is it really worth it?
>>
>> There isn't any use of zpool_destroy_pool preceded by an if
>> There is one and only one use of zpool_destroy_pool.
>>
>
> Yes, that's why I asked. I don't think that zpool_destroy_pool()
> will gain any significant amount of users soon (well, who knows),
> so I'm fine with keeping it out of checkpatch checks. Just checked
> your opinion.

I really doubt if zpool will be used by anyone other than zswap anytime soon.

>
>         -ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/