[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611095144.GC515@swordfish>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:51:44 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Add some <foo>_destroy functions to
NEEDLESS_IF tests
On (06/11/15 11:41), Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > Sergey Senozhatsky has modified several destroy functions that can
> > now be called with NULL values.
> >
> > - kmem_cache_destroy()
> > - mempool_destroy()
> > - dma_pool_destroy()
>
> I don't actually see any null test in the definition of dma_pool_destroy,
> in the linux-next 54896f27dd5 (20150610). So I guess it would be
> premature to send patches to remove the null tests.
>
yes,
Andrew Morton:
: I'll park these patches until after 4.1 is released - it's getting to
: that time...
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists