lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:00:53 +0800
From:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Vipul Gandhi <vgandhi@...eaurora.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
	Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, rjw@...ysocki.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver

On 11 June 2015 at 08:22, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Fu Wei wrote:
>>
>> If we make the first stage timeout is timeout/2,  this violates the
>> definition of timeout.
>
>
> The documentation says that the hardware needs to reset after the timeout
> expires.

yes , you are absolutely on this. Great thanks for point out this.
my patch is doing this way: trigger WS1 at the timeout expires
Before that, using pretimeout for WS0 as an warning.


> If you program the hardware to timeout/2, the driver can ignore
> WS0 and allow WS1 to reset the hardware.  That conforms to the
> documentation.

yes, technically we can do nothing in WS0, and just wait for WS1.
So SBSA watchdog become a one stage timeout watchdog, right?
So if user want the WS0 warning, How to make driver know that, and do
something in WS0 routine?
I think by this way,  two stage timeouts, WS0 "alert" will be meaningless.

Could you suggest a good way to use WS0, so we can follow SBSA spec?

>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists