[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55798A28.3080000@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:16:24 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ACPI / gsi: Add gsi_mutex to synchronize acpi_register_gsi()/acpi_unregister_gsi()
On 06/10/2015 11:58 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 18/05/15 13:59, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Add a mutex for acpi_register_gsi()/acpi_unregister_gsi() to avoid
>> concurrency issues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/gsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> index 55b5f31..ab0dcb4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model;
>> /* ACPI core domian pointing to GICv2/3 core domain */
>> struct irq_domain *acpi_irq_domain __read_mostly;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(gsi_mutex);
>>
>> static unsigned int acpi_gsi_get_irq_type(int trigger, int polarity)
>> {
>> @@ -73,20 +74,24 @@ int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger,
>> int irq;
>> unsigned int irq_type = acpi_gsi_get_irq_type(trigger, polarity);
>>
>> + mutex_lock(&gsi_mutex);
>> irq = irq_find_mapping(acpi_irq_domain, gsi);
>> if (irq > 0)
>> - return irq;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> irq = irq_domain_alloc_irqs(acpi_irq_domain, 1, dev_to_node(dev),
>> &gsi);
>> if (irq <= 0)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> /* Set irq type if specified and different than the current one */
>> if (irq_type != IRQ_TYPE_NONE &&
>> irq_type != irq_get_trigger_type(irq))
>> irq_set_irq_type(irq, irq_type);
>> - return irq;
>> +
>> +out:
>> + mutex_unlock(&gsi_mutex);
>> + return irq > 0 ? irq : -EINVAL;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi);
>>
>> @@ -96,8 +101,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi);
>> */
>> void acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi)
>> {
>> - int irq = irq_find_mapping(acpi_irq_domain, gsi);
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&gsi_mutex);
>> + irq = irq_find_mapping(acpi_irq_domain, gsi);
>>
>> irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
>> + mutex_unlock(&gsi_mutex);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_gsi);
>>
>
> Can you point out why we need this locking? The rest of the kernel seems
> to live without it pretty well. And if we really have an issue, I'd
Hmm, I'm not so sure, I will look deep into that and come back later.
> prefer seeing it fixed in the core code rather than in something that is
> very much firmware-specific.
I agree if there are real issues.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists