[an error occurred while processing this directive]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150611101248.2163a703@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:12:48 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL] ring-buffer: Fix for module parameter of producer in
 ring_buffer_benchmark

Linus,

Wang Long fixed a minor bug in the module parameter for the
ring buffer benchmark, where the produce_fifo was being ignored
and the producer thread's priority was being set with the consumer_fifo
parameter.

Note, this commit is in my queue for the 4.2 merge window. I realized
that I had marked this fix for stable, and I know you prefer to have
stable fixes sent to you even if it's late in the rc releases. This is
a minor fix but a fix that should go to stable anyway. It's just the
ring_buffer_benchmark module uses the consumer_fifo parameter to decide
the producer's priority, and the producer_fifo parameter is ignored.
This isn't a major bug as I've always had the two priorities the same
and that's why I never noticed it.

Feel free to pull this, or if you want, you can wait till it goes in
via the merge window. It's currently the last patch of my queue, so I
can still take it out if you decide to pull it in now.

Please pull the latest trace-rb-bm-fix-4.1-rc7 tree, which can be found at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
trace-rb-bm-fix-4.1-rc7

Tag SHA1: 29ac96b409bd93b15bb00bf4063f9bf573f6b3b7
Head SHA1: 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12

Wang Long (1):
      ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

----
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---------------------------
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12
Author: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 10 08:12:37 2015 +0000

    ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

    The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
    so correct it.

    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

    Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
    Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
    Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 13d945c0d03f..1b28df2d9104 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)

 	if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
 		struct sched_param param = {
-			.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+			.sched_priority = producer_fifo
 		};
 		sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 	} else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/