[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611141353.GA9447@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:13:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] x86/mm: Implement lockless
pgd_alloc()/pgd_free()
[ I fat-fingered the linux-mm Cc:, so every reply will bounce on that,
sorry about that :-/ Fixed it in this mail's Cc: list. ]
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Waiman Long reported 'pgd_lock' contention on high CPU count systems and
> proposed moving pgd_lock on a separate cacheline to eliminate false sharing and
> to reduce some of the lock bouncing overhead.
So 'pgd_lock' is a global lock, used for every new task creation:
arch/x86/mm/fault.c:DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pgd_lock);
which with a sufficiently high CPU count starts to hurt.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists