[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611001129.GB21213@yumi.tdiedrich.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 02:11:29 +0200
From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Return -EPROBE_DEFER if the gpiochip was
not found
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 04:05:05 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > If a driver requests a GPIO described in its _CRS but the GPIO host
> > controller (gpiochip) driver providing the GPIO has not been loaded yet
> > acpi_get_gpiod() returns -ENODEV which causes the calling driver to fail.
> >
> > If the gpiochip driver is loaded afterwards the driver requesting the GPIO
> > will not notice this.
> >
> > Better approach is to return -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. Then when the
> > gpiochip driver appears the driver requesting the GPIO will be probed
> > again. This also aligns ACPI GPIO lookup code closer to DT as it does
> > pretty much the same when no gpiochip driver was found.
> >
> > Reported-by: Tobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>
--
Tobias PGP: http://8ef7ddba.uguu.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists