[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611143640.GA24637@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:36:40 -0700
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Abdul, Hussain (H.)" <habdul@...teon.com>
Cc: "vthakkar1994@...il.com" <vthakkar1994@...il.com>,
"hamohammed.sa@...il.com" <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
"tapaswenipathak@...il.com" <tapaswenipathak@...il.com>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@...teon.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
> rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
> retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
> synaptics_rmi4_irq,
> - platformdata->irq_type,
> + platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
> if (retval) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
Have you tested this? This changes the behavior of the code, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists