[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5579190E.8000803@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:13:50 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vipul Gandhi <vgandhi@...eaurora.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, rjw@...ysocki.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver
On 06/10/2015 08:45 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Fu Wei wrote:
>> Could you suggest a good way to use WS0, so we can follow SBSA spec?
>
> To avoid the timeout/2 problem, WS0 calls panic, which is the "real" timeout/reset. WS1 is then a "backup" that is ignored by the driver. That is, the driver doesn't do anything with WS1 and it doesn't tell the kernel about WS1.
>
> I know you don't like the idea of WS1 as a backup timeout, but this is one way to solve the problem.
>
This is what I would do.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists