[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1072261434036874@web13o.yandex.ru>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:34:34 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] w1: masters: omap_hdq: Add support for 1-wire mode
Hi
25.05.2015, 08:15, "Vignesh R" <vigneshr@...com>:
>> HDQ mode remains unchanged.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
I have no experience with omap_hdq platform, but there are quite a few questions
related to IO - you never check whether write was successful or read returned actually
valid data, is it ok? I mean is it correct to assume that read can not return 0xff for example
and it is a sign that something is wrong, or this can not happen?
As for me, I have no objection, but this patch must go via omap tree imo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists