[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611062452.GB32133@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:24:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Generic kernel features that need architecture(mips) support
(Jon Cc:-ed)
* Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com> wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 04:58 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> > How are the documentation files in Documentation/features/ maintained?
> > They were automatically generated so I wonder if I have to take care
> > of anything.
>
> CC: Ingo and related ml.
So changes to Documentation/features/ should come as simple patches done from hand
editing, there's no need to preserve any initial (half-)automated generation.
Formatting should be preserved so that Documentation/features/list-arch.sh still
works as before.
Jon: would you like to receive all patches to Documentation/features/ so you can
collect them in the documentation tree, or can maintainers patch it as part of any
feature work that affects the tables? I think it's all finegrained enough to not
create conflicts. That way they would become partly self-maintaining. (Or at least
one can always hope! ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists