linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] x86/asm: Add FP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150611064633.GA817@amd>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:46:33 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] x86/asm: Add FP_SAVE/RESTORE frame pointer
 macros

On Thu 2015-06-11 06:22:49, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/func.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/func.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..4d62782
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/func.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > > +#ifndef _ASM_X86_FUNC_H
> > > +#define _ASM_X86_FUNC_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> > > +#include <asm/asm.h>
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * These are frame pointer save and restore macros.  They should be used by
> > > + * every callable non-leaf asm function.
> > > + */
> > > +.macro FP_SAVE name
> > > +	.if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > > +		push %_ASM_BP
> > > +		_ASM_MOV %_ASM_SP, %_ASM_BP
> > > +	.endif
> > > +.endm
> > 
> > Hmm. This will not compile when included into .c file. Should it have
> > other extension than .h? (Or can the macros be done in different way?
> 
> We have quite a few of .h headers in the kernel already which are supposed 
> to be included only by .S files, so what exactly is the problem you are 
> seeing here?

Such as...? Can this be merged into one of them so that we don't have
a separate file? For example "frame.h"?

(I thought asm includes traditionally had different extension, but I
may be mistaken).

And at the very least, dwarf2.h includes

#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#warning "asm/dwarf2.h should be only included in pure assembly files"
#endif

and guards stuff that would not compile in C with

#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
....

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/