[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <557A811E.7010208@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:50:06 -0700
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
jwboyer@...hat.com, richard@....at, steved@...hat.com,
qat-linux@...el.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 2/4] crypto: add PKE API
On 06/11/2015 07:59 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> +int crypto_akcipher_setkey(struct crypto_akcipher *tfm,
>> > + const struct public_key *pkey)
>> > +{
>> > + if (tfm->pkey)
>> > + akcipher_free_key(tfm->pkey);
>> > +
>> > + return akcipher_clone_key(tfm, pkey);
>> > +}
> No please do not expose the struct public_key crap to the new
> API. The key should be completely opaque to entities outside
> of the algorithm. So make it raw and read out the MPIs from
> it.
>
> The contents of the function must go into the algorithm setkey
> function, not the crypto API. So RSA would read out however
> many MPIs it needs and verify it, and so on.
Should I make it MPI[] rather than void *
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists