[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150612094509.GC19400@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:45:10 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>
Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>,
Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] drivers: pwm: core: Add pwmchip_add_inversed
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:08:16PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> From: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...il.com>
>
> Add a new function to register a PWM chip with channels that have their
> initial polarity as inversed. This benefits drivers of controllers that
> by default operate with inversed polarity by removing the need to modify
> the polarity during initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/pwm.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
I had to bikeshed this a little, so I ended up applying a variant that
exports pwmchip_add_with_polarity() instead of having the additional
wrapper. The rationale here is that pwmchip_add_with_polarity() is more
explicit than pwmchip_add_inversed().
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists