[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150611202135.ee070955.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:21:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Subject: Re: diffs in changelogs
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:12:59 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 13:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > People often put diff snippets in changelogs. This causes problems
> > when one tries to apply a file containing both the changelog and the
> > diff because patch(1) tries to apply the diff which it found in the
> > changelog.
> That
> > eg, something like
> >
> > git show d24a6e1087030b6da | patch -p1
> >
> > will go haywire.
> >
> > So can we please have a checkpatch test warning people away from doing
> > this?
> >
> >
> > patch(1) seems to be really promiscuous in its detection of a patch. I
> > haven't had much success searching for "^--- " and similar. What works
> > best for me is searching for "^[whitespace]@@ -".
>
> I don't think that's a good test.
> Coccinelle uses @@
>
> And how did that commit actually get applied?
Good question. Maybe `git apply' is smarter about this than patch(1)?
> I tried applying it to a new branch checked out at
> ce2b3f595e1c56639085645e0130426e443008c0, it fails.
There are tons of them:
z:/usr/src/git26> git log | grep "^[ ]*@@ -" | wc -l
120
> Anyway, maybe:
Looks good, thanks. -ENOCHANGELOG. Please send it for real when convenient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists