[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <557A58A5.4010208@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:57:25 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: fu.wei@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
CC: tekkamanninja@...il.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
al.stone@...aro.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, linux@...ck-us.net,
vgandhi@...eaurora.org, wim@...ana.be, jcm@...hat.com,
leo.duran@....com, corbet@....net, mark.rutland@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH non-pretimeout 4/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA
watchdog driver
fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
> + if (timeout <= gwdt->max_wor_timeout)
> + writel_relaxed(timeout * gwdt->clk,
> + gwdt->control_base + SBSA_GWDT_WOR);
> + else
> + writel_relaxed(gwdt->max_wor_timeout * gwdt->clk,
> + gwdt->control_base + SBSA_GWDT_WOR);
You pre-calculate the maximum timeout possible already, so why do you
need the if-statement?
Frankly, your non-pretimeout driver is almost identical to mine, which
was posted weeks ago. At this point, you're really just copying my
driver but putting your name on it.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists