linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:56:02 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog and
> all.  It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.

Great, I'm convinced by your reasoning that this makes sense.  I'm
building 3.10.80 patched with this (needed a tiny bit of context
adjustment because acpi_dev_filter_resource_type() hadn't been added
to 3.10 yet), and will confirm that it fixes the issue I saw.

Thanks!
  Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/