[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <557BB084.8030800@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:24:36 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf,tools: add time out to force stop endless mmap
processing
coming back to this ...
On 6/12/15 2:39 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>> Yes, perf always can read proc file. The problem is that the proc file
>>> is huge and keep growing faster than proc reader.
>>> So perf top do loop in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events until the
>>> test case exit.
>>
>> I'm confused. How are you getting the above time to read /proc maps if it
>> never finishes?
>
> I just tried to simplify the issue for perf record. So you may noticed that
> I only read one thread. There are several threads in the system.
> Also, I do the perf record test when starting the test case.
> The proc file is not that big.
> For perf top, it will monitor whole system. So it never finishes.
If the proc file is not that big for perf-record why is it a problem for
perf-top? Both should only be reading the maps file for the thread group
leader once and after it is processed getting MMAP events for changes.
Why do you say perf-top can't handle it but perf-record can?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists