[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150614070319.GA15988@amd>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:03:20 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Load __USER_DS into DS/ES after resume
On Sun 2015-06-14 08:56:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > >> So if wakeup_pmode_return is really the first thing called then the whole
> > >> premise of shadow descriptor corruption goes out the window: we reload all
> > >> relevant segment registers.
> > >
> > > True, but it still leaves the fact that we're loading __KERNEL_DS instead of
> > > __USER_DS, right? So we end up in the kernel in some context (I have no clue
> > > what context) with __KERNEL_DS loaded. It's very easy for us to inadvertently
> > > fix it: we could return to userspace by any means whatsoever except SYSEXIT,
> > > or we could even return back to some preempted kernel context.
> > >
> > > I still think we should replace __KERNEL_DS with __USER_DS in
> > > wakeup_pmode_return and see if the problem goes away.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that's what the problem is. If you look at the sysexit path, it
> > never reloads ds/es. It assumes they are still __USER_DS set at sysenter. The
> > iret path does restore all the user segments.
>
> Ok, so something like the patch below, right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
> =====================>
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
> index 665c6b7d2ea9..7302bbaea184 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
> @@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_pmode_return)
> wakeup_pmode_return:
> movw $__KERNEL_DS, %ax
> movw %ax, %ss
> - movw %ax, %ds
> - movw %ax, %es
> movw %ax, %fs
> movw %ax, %gs
>
> + movw $__KERNEL_DS, %ax
> + movw %ax, %ds
> + movw %ax, %es
Umm. Are you sure? :-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists