[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7OjJukyBxDUPz_1n7hoXTru9P0X2ycz_s3Ls6pdw2WO5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:12:55 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] regulator: qcom-spmi: Add vendor specific configuration
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Add support for over current protection (OCP), pin control
>> selection, soft start and soft start strength, auto-mode, input
>> current limiting, and pull down.
>>
>> Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes from v1:
>> * New patch split from original SPMI regulator driver
>>
>> .../bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.txt | 62 +++++
>> drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c | 298 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.txt
>> index 75b4604bad07..ab01a152e930 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.txt
>> @@ -99,6 +99,68 @@ see regulator.txt - with additional custom properties described below:
>> soft start are active all the time. 0 = Set initial mode to
>> low power mode (LPM).
>>
>> +- qcom,auto-mode-enable:
>
> Auto regulator modes are fairly common. Can't we have a common property here?
>
I went with a similar set of booleans for mode selection in the
initial rpm driver for family A, but Kumar objected to this. So there
I ended up with "qcom,force-mode" - taking an enum - instead (see
mfd/qcom-rpm.txt). It would be nice if the various regulator drivers
have similar bindings...
>> + Usage: optional
>> + Value type: <u32>
>
> This can be bool. Unless we want to have a mode property with "auto"
> being one possible value.
>
>> + Description: 1 = Enable automatic hardware selection of regulator
>> + mode (HPM vs LPM); not available on boost type
>> + regulators. 0 = Disable auto mode selection.
>> +
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists