[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615111526.GB4481@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:15:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Tony Li <tony.li@....com>, Ken Xue <ken.xue@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86, mwaitt: introduce mwaix delay with a
configurable timer
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:57:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Seeing how we disable C states, its unlikely to use less energy, so what
> exactly is its benefit, other than using fancy new instructions?
If the "disabling of C states" turns into a "go into a C-state which has
small wakeup latency" in the future, would be cool. Because we have a
bunch of places where we do delay.
Rui, what happens if you enter C1 instead? Any improvements or is the
wakeup latency too high?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists