lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:38:53 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
	Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 04/14] crypto: add a new driver for Marvell's
 CESA

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:48:27 +0800
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:15:56AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >
> > +static void mv_cesa_dequeue_req_unlocked(struct mv_cesa_engine *engine)
> > +{
> > +	struct crypto_async_request *req;
> > +	struct mv_cesa_ctx *ctx;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&cesa_dev->lock);
> > +	req = crypto_dequeue_request(&cesa_dev->queue);
> 
> Need to call crypto_get_backlog before this so you can do the
> backlog notification afterwards.

Oh right.
I still have trouble understanding the need for the backlog concept
(maybe you can give some insight): the backlog is just another list
where we put all the requests when the queue has exceeded the limit
fixed in crypto_queue_init, but the result is pretty much the same, the
request stored in the backlog will be handled at some point, so what's
the real point of this backlog.

Anyway, this question was just for my own understanding of this thing:
I'll fix the code to notify users that their request is in progress.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ