[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615131728.GK15793@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:17:28 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:14:19AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Yes, which is why most of the distro vendors carry an out-of-tree
> patch that disables the old kexec in an SB setup. It would be nice if
> we could merge said patches. However, they depend on Matthew's
> secure_modules/trusted_kernel/<whatever name that works> patchset
> which has gotten little movement since we came up with a tentative
> agreement at LPC 2013.
Signed modules is in, though, right? And the fact that we have
CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION means we're doing unatural file
signatures w/o using ELF, which I thought was the basis of Linus's
accusation that Red Hat was performing intimate/physical acts with
Microsoft. :-)
I would have thought those were the nasty bits to get in; out of
curiosity, what's still missing?
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists