[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL2PR03MB54503B16A47056DBA9653C0E6B80@BL2PR03MB545.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:40:46 +0000
From: Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC,v3 02/10] dpaa_eth: add support for DPAA Ethernet
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
>
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 17:56 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > This introduces the Freescale Data Path Acceleration Architecture
> > (DPAA) Ethernet driver (dpaa_eth) that builds upon the DPAA QMan,
> > BMan, PAMU and FMan drivers to deliver Ethernet connectivity on
> > the Freescale DPAA QorIQ platforms.
> ...
>
> > + /* We're going to store the skb backpointer at the beginning
> > + * of the data buffer, so we need a privately owned skb
> > + */
> > +
> > + /* Code borrowed from skb_unshare(). */
> > + if (skb_cloned(skb)) {
> > + struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +
> > + /* Finally, create a contig FD from this skb */
> > + skb_to_contig_fd(priv, skb, &fd, countptr, &offset);
> > +
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + skb = nskb;
> > + /* skb_copy() has now linearized the skbuff. */
> > + }
> > +
>
> You know that TCP packets are clones, right ?
> This code is killing performance.
>
> TCP allows the headers part being modified by a driver if needed.
>
> You should use skb_header_cloned() instead.
Thank you, I'll address this. I plan to do something like this:
+ if (!nonlinear) {
+ /* We're going to store the skb backpointer at the beginning
+ * of the data buffer, so we need a privately owned skb
+ */
+
+ /* make sure skb is not shared, skb_cow_head() assumes it's not */
+ skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!skb)
+ goto enomem;
+
+ /* verify the skb head is not cloned */
+ if (skb_cow_head(skb, priv->tx_headroom))
+ goto enomem;
+
+ nonlinear = skb_is_nonlinear(skb);
+ }
but I'm not sure the skb_share_check() is required on tx.
I'm also a bit puzzled by the aliasing between shared and cloned terms
(i.e. skb_unshare() could be named something like skb_unclone();
the skb_share_check() not only checks but also unshares an skb so
the already taken skb_unshare() name would probably fit too).
Madalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists