linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOi1vP_VLVVhoFrJ+ETRa7+o+sAjyHquZR_g2kYdO9n-8jxdoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:27:31 +0300
From:	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:	juncheng bai <baijuncheng@...tedstack.com>
Cc:	idryomov@...hat.com, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
	Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@...tank.com>, lucienchao@...il.com,
	jeff@...zik.org, yehuda@...newdream.net,
	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, elder@...tank.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to
 the, size of the object

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, juncheng bai
<baijuncheng@...tedstack.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai
>> <baijuncheng@...tedstack.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: juncheng bai <baijuncheng@...tedstack.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the
>>>   size of the object
>>>
>>> ensures that the merged size of request can achieve the size of
>>> the object.
>>> when merge a bio to request or merge a request to request, the
>>> sum of the segment number of the current request and the segment
>>> number of the bio is not greater than the max segments of the request,
>>> so the max size of request is 512k if the max segments of request is
>>> BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: juncheng bai <baijuncheng@...tedstack.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> index 0a54c58..dec6045 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> @@ -3757,6 +3757,8 @@ static int rbd_init_disk(struct rbd_device
>>> *rbd_dev)
>>>          segment_size = rbd_obj_bytes(&rbd_dev->header);
>>>          blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, segment_size / SECTOR_SIZE);
>>>          blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, segment_size);
>>> +       if (segment_size > BLK_MAX_SEGMENTS * PAGE_SIZE)
>>> +               blk_queue_max_segments(q, segment_size / PAGE_SIZE);
>>>          blk_queue_io_min(q, segment_size);
>>>          blk_queue_io_opt(q, segment_size);
>>
>>
>> I made a similar patch on Friday, investigating blk-mq plugging issue
>> reported by Nick.  My patch sets it to BIO_MAX_PAGES unconditionally -
>> AFAIU there is no point in setting to anything bigger since the bios
>> will be clipped to that number of vecs.  Given that BIO_MAX_PAGES is
>> 256, this gives is 1M direct I/Os.
>
> Hi. For signal bio, the max number of bio_vec is BIO_MAX_PAGES, but a
> request can be merged from multiple bios. We can see the below function:
> ll_back_merge_fn, ll_front_merge_fn and etc.
> And I test in kernel 3.18 use this patch, and do:
> echo 4096 > /sys/block/rbd0/queue/max_sectors_kb
> We use systemtap to trace the request size, It is upto 4M.

Kernel 3.18 is pre rbd blk-mq transition, which happened in 4.0.  You
should test whatever patches you have with at least 4.0.

Putting that aside, I must be missing something.  You'll get 4M
requests on 3.18 both with your patch and without it, the only
difference would be the size of bios being merged - 512k vs 1M.  Can
you describe your test workload and provide before and after traces?

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/