linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add A53 clock driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <557EF0EB.9040403@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:36:11 +0300
From:	Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	sboyd@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add A53 clock driver

On 06/15/2015 04:58 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 11:41 +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-a53.c
> 
>> +static int __init qcom_a53_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_driver_register(&qcom_a53_driver);
>> +}
>> +arch_initcall(qcom_a53_init);
> 
> There's no function that's, well, called by module_exit() that undoes
> the above. So one can build this as a module, load that module, but not
> unload it. That's by design?
> 
> 

In general, it is not expected to unload it as this is for the
main CPU clock, but i will add a module_exit() call to make it
correct. Thanks for the comment!

BR,
Georgi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/