linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150615202514.GC12450@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 22:25:14 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso
 test


* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 06/13/2015 08:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> The test is fairly simplistic: it checks that all registers
> >> are preserved across 32-bit syscall via VDSO.
> >>
> >> Run-tested:
> >>
> >> $ ./test_syscall_vdso_32
> >> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via VDSO
> >> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
> >> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via INT 80
> >> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
> >> [RUN]	Running tests under ptrace
> >> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via VDSO
> >> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
> >> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via INT 80
> >> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
> > 
> > Just curious: is there a kernel sha1 where this test would fail? Or did you try to 
> > provoke an information leak perhaps?
> 
> I did see failures, more than once, when testing my own patches.

Ok!

> I'm not aware of released kernels which are buggy wrt this test.

Great! :-)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/