[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615211816.GC16138@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:18:16 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart_hayes@...l.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible broken MM code in dell-laptop.c?
On Sun 14-06-15 11:05:07, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c is this part of code:
>
> static int __init dell_init(void)
> {
> ...
> /*
> * Allocate buffer below 4GB for SMI data--only 32-bit physical addr
> * is passed to SMI handler.
> */
> bufferpage = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA32);
[...]
> buffer = page_address(bufferpage);
[...]
> fail_rfkill:
> free_page((unsigned long)bufferpage);
This one should be __free_page because it consumes struct page* and it
is the proper counter part for alloc_page. free_page, just to make it
confusing, consumes an address which has to be translated to a struct
page.
I have no idea why the API has been done this way and yeah, it is really
confusing.
[...]
> static void __exit dell_exit(void)
> {
> ...
> free_page((unsigned long)buffer);
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists