[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506151004420.3447@vshiva-Udesk>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"Juvva, Kanaka D" <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>,
"Williamson, Glenn P" <glenn.p.williamson@...el.com>,
"Auld, Will" <will.auld@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation
enumeration
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:17:17AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * Probe test for Haswell CPUs.
>> + */
>> + if (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model == 0x3f)
>> + return hsw_probetest();
>
> Firstly, isn't a probe already a test?
Will fix the name to hsw_probe
>
> Secondly, there's more HSW models:
>
> case 60: /* 22nm Haswell Core */
> case 63: /* 22nm Haswell Server */
> case 69: /* 22nm Haswell ULT */
> case 70: /* 22nm Haswell + GT3e (Intel Iris Pro graphics) */
>
> Is this really only HSW server,
Yes , this probe is only targeted at HSW servers as of now.
or should they all be listed?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists