lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2891939.OHrpPqfymO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:05:54 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	"Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / sleep: cancel the synchronous restriction of pm-trace

On Monday, June 15, 2015 01:32:00 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> 
> On 2015/5/28 22:43, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> >
> > On 2015/5/21 9:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 04:50:13 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> >>> On 2015/5/16 8:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

[cut]

> >>>> Won't this serialize the whole thing again?
> >>> Yes, this mutex lock will ultimately serialize all PM operations. But, all device's PM operations are asynchronous each other at first. So, the PM operation order of all devices will vary in multiple suspend/resume. This can be similar to real to an extreme, and helpful to debugging.
> >> I see.  You're saying that callbacks will be serialized, but if they originally
> >> would be asynchronous with respect to each other (they may run in parallel IOW),
> >> their respective ordering may vary between suspend-resume cycles.
> >>
> >> The class of bugs you can catch this way is quite limited and the change is
> >> rather intrusive, so I'm with Pavel on that.
> > Sorry for late reply.
> >
> > Although the improvement to PM-trace is limited, I still think it is helpful for debugging some special suspend/resume bugs.
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> This patch will not be merged into mainline kernel, right?

No, it won't.

At least for now, the case for it is not convincing enough.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ