linux-kernel - Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict with XFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <557E6C0C.3050802@monom.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:09:16 +0200
From:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Morten Stevens <mstevens@...oraproject.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm: shmem_zero_setup skip security check and lockdep conflict
 with XFS

On 06/14/2015 06:48 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> It appears that, at some point last year, XFS made directory handling
> changes which bring it into lockdep conflict with shmem_zero_setup():
> it is surprising that mmap() can clone an inode while holding mmap_sem,
> but that has been so for many years.
> 
> Since those few lockdep traces that I've seen all implicated selinux,
> I'm hoping that we can use the __shmem_file_setup(,,,S_PRIVATE) which
> v3.13's commit c7277090927a ("security: shmem: implement kernel private
> shmem inodes") introduced to avoid LSM checks on kernel-internal inodes:
> the mmap("/dev/zero") cloned inode is indeed a kernel-internal detail.
> 
> This also covers the !CONFIG_SHMEM use of ramfs to support /dev/zero
> (and MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS).  I thought there were also drivers
> which cloned inode in mmap(), but if so, I cannot locate them now.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>

Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>

Sorry for the long delay. It took me a while to figure out my original
setup. I could verify that this patch made the lockdep message go away
on 4.0-rc6 and also on 4.1-rc8.

For the record: SELinux needs to be enabled triggering it.

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/